So tell us Resident Smart Guy™, if Initiative 26 is wrong in defining a "person" then who is right and why? Where is the line if one exists, and why not this one? It's more absolute than any other, is it not?
Okay, I get it that liberals are upset with the Citizens United decision, but surely they agree that actual humans are in fact actual humans- or maybe none of us are.
BONUS SOMEWHAT RELATED MATERIAL:
The Smart Guy™ describes GPCC as "an advocacy organization, which is fine, but which also should be clear when it comes to public image and funding."
Of course, the Smart Guy™ never expressed any similar concerns about Planned Parenthood. In fact, he seemed quite perturbed that the public funding of that organization would come into question.
That kind of double standard isn't really "Truth In Advertising" either when it comes to alleged principles and the Smart Guy™.
UPDATE: Michele writes "I am amazed that an enlightened society in 2011 is still sanctioning the slaughter of its children. It's sick and barbaric."
That is almost verbatim the same point I have made before in this forum and elsewhere. Michle is exactly right.